Even if we divert or eliminate all new waste, landfills will emit greenhouse gas for decades. According to the EPA,...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/841b5/841b59675651b6983e05bca77a6c4e86e130bbad" alt="Zero Waste is Not Zero Waste Emissions"
Even if we divert or eliminate all new waste, landfills will emit greenhouse gas for decades. According to the EPA,...
Apathy toward U.S. landfill gas capture projects means that more methane is being released into the atmosphere. For...
As regular readers know, Terrapass recently conducted a full review of the Tontitown landfill methane flaring project,...
If you're not sick of Tontitown yet, check out TreeHugger's great interview with Wes Muir from Waste Management, the...
The regulatory test is the big hurdle for Tontitown. Regulatory compulsion is a death knell for additionality. Although it is indisputably true that Waste Management was under no strict requirement to implement a methane flaring system, it is also true that WM used the ...
With the addition of Dan Kammen, our review panel is now complete. Dr. Kammen is a professor in the Energy and Resources Group, Professor of Public Policy in the Goldman School of Public Policy and Professor of Nuclear Engineering in the Department of Nuclear Engineerin...
One of the most intuitively appealing additionality tests is also among the most controversial with environmental policy types. The financial test asks whether the revenue from carbon offsets are enough to tip the budgetary scales so that a money-losing project becomes ...
Perhaps the simplest additionality criterion is the timing test. The timing test asks whether the timing of the project is compatible with the notion that carbon offsets played a role in its development. So, for example, projects that are too old will fail a timing test...
Discount Applied Successfully!
Your savings have been added to the cart.