What Does Carbon Negative Mean? Neutral vs. Negative

The answer is not quite as cut and dry as yes or no. There are several means available to reduce emissions at their source and to offset others that cannot be reduced, as well as offset more than you are responsible for yourself. But there are also issues when it comes to defining what carbon neutrality and, therefore, carbon negativity really entail.

Below is a comprehensive exploration of carbon measurement, what it means to be carbon negative, and if it can in fact be achieved.

Carbon Negative Pledges in 2026: A Real-World Example

Microsoft is one of the most visible companies pursuing carbon negativity, having pledged in 2020 to be carbon negative by 2030. It’s a useful case study for how hard this actually is in practice.

Microsoft’s experience illustrates the core theme of this article well: carbon negativity is achievable in principle, but it requires sustained investment in both source reductions and high-quality removals, and even well-funded companies can see their numbers move the wrong way before they move the right way.

What Does Carbon Negative Mean?

Carbon negative means, in effect, that you emit less than zero carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) greenhouse gasses. However, since it is impossible to emit a negative amount of carbon (or any other physical substance), being carbon negative refers to the net emissions you create. To be carbon negative means to offset more carbon, through carbon capture, sequestration, or avoidance, than you contribute to the environment.

Carbon offsets can be complicated, but their basic function is to take carbon from the air or prevent carbon from being emitted through alternate practices and measure the amount in the form of carbon credits. Each credit is generally equal to 1 metric ton of CO2 avoided or captured.

Any organization or individual that wishes to lower their carbon footprint can purchase these credits, which have effectively “offset” the equivalent amount of carbon, with one credit negating one metric ton of CO2e. In this sense, anyone could offset more than their total amount of carbon, but it is extremely hard to get any carbon footprint low enough to do this without buying massive amounts of offsets.

Even a single person has a much larger footprint than they might expect, given all the emissions tied into everyday activities that most people are not even aware of. People in developing areas tend to have lower carbon footprints, but this is due in large part to the fact that they are unable to afford to use as much of the products and services tied to the carbon cycle, and are therefore typically unable to purchase the credits needed to offset even their comparatively lower footprint.

Giant companies may be able to buy enough offsets to reach carbon neutrality if they do not have an inherently carbon-intensive product, though even then they would need to set aside a considerably large budget to do so, which would not only eat into profits but also, probably, money needed for organizational expenses. Any company that seriously wants to achieve carbon neutrality must invest in reducing emissions from their operations to lower the amount of carbon that needs to be offset.

In short, carbon negativity requires implementing actions that lower emissions from the source while also purchasing a significant amount of credits to offset the remaining emissions and then some, and it is difficult, though possible, to achieve.

How Is Carbon Negative Different Than Carbon Neutral?

The terms “carbon neutral” and “carbon negative” sit on the same spectrum, one just uses slightly more offsets than the other to achieve. In theory, a person or organization could be carbon neutral without offsets if they did not use anything within the carbon cycle at all, even for a single second.

However, this is virtually impossible, as even riding your bicycle has a carbon footprint associated with the manufacturing of the bike, which counts toward your personal carbon footprint. Likewise, any food eaten that has been shipped in any way, grown using any methods that are not completely carbon-free, and so on will have a carbon footprint associated with it.

So, in reality, at present everywhere around the world, it is essentially impossible to be completely carbon neutral without offsetting some amount. Fortunately, the carbon footprint of riding a bike is minuscule when compared to all other types of transportation, and it is increasingly easier to eat locally grown food, making it easier to lower your carbon footprint in the first place, and in turn easier to reach carbon neutrality. Going one step further and offsetting more than you emit is the difference between being carbon neutral and carbon negative.

How Is Carbon Negative Different Than Achieving Net-Zero Emissions?

This is a tricky one, since there is some debate around whether buying offsets to reach carbon neutrality is the same as having net-zero emissions. Typically, though definitions vary, net-zero emissions refers to people or companies that reduce their carbon emissions as much as possible from things that they can control and then offset the remainder to be carbon neutral. This is considered different from regular carbon neutral because you are making a concerted effort to reduce emissions at their source instead of continuing business as usual and purchasing offsets without making any changes in behavior or actions.

It is possible to achieve net-zero emissions and also be carbon negative, at least based on the definition above. Any company or person that reduces carbon output within their control to the lowest levels possible, and then offsets more than the remainder, can be considered both carbon negative and to have net-zero emissions.

Is It Possible to Reach Carbon Negativity?

As mentioned above, it is possible to reach carbon negativity, but it will take a coordinated effort to reduce emissions from their source and a significant amount of offsets to get there.

One of the best ways to realistically reach carbon negativity is to employ different methods of carbon reduction to complement lowering emissions from the source. These include nature-based solutions, enhanced nature solutions, and direct air carbon capture, all of which can be done directly by companies, or through offsetting projects, which is typically easier and more verifiable.

It takes effort, a coordinated approach, and conscious investment, both of money and time, to reach true carbon negativity. It’s possible, as some major companies have proclaimed this as a goal, but as the Microsoft example above shows, even well-resourced companies with a clear plan can see the gap widen before it narrows, particularly as energy-intensive technology like AI drives up their footprint faster than clean energy and removals can offset it.

How Can Companies and Individuals Reach Carbon Negative Goals?

There are many simple and practical ways for people and companies to get within striking distance of being carbon negative. From there, it is up to them to make the extra effort to achieve this status associated with offsetting more carbon than they emit.

First things first, make sure all energy used in direct operations comes from renewables or other carbon-free sources, such as nuclear. This applies to company activities that directly use energy and individual activities that use energy within the home.

Next, it is imperative to reduce indirect emissions as much as possible. For a company, this can be done by reviewing a supply chain to find suppliers and logistics that create fewer emissions, or by limiting employee Scope 3 emissions, such as those attributable to commuting to and from work. For individuals, this can be done by making smart choices outside the home, from riding a bike to eating locally grown food.

Lastly, after you’ve tallied up your total carbon footprint for yourself or your company, invest in more offsets than the amount of carbon emitted. It is important to ensure that the offsets you purchase are verified and of good quality, ideally with co-benefits for nature and communities in the areas where they are generated. Remember: one credit typically equals 1 metric ton of carbon removed from the atmosphere; you just need to buy more credits than tons you’ve emitted to reach carbon-negative status.

What Role Do Offsets Play in Becoming Carbon Negative?

Offsets play a major role in becoming carbon negative. In fact, it would be impossible to achieve carbon negativity without them. This is because, as stated above, it is impossible to emit a negative amount of a physical substance, in this case, carbon dioxide. Offsets are needed to remove excess carbon and to go past neutral into negative territory. And, as also stated above, it is essentially impossible in the modern world, virtually anywhere on the planet, to avoid using or eating something that hasn’t emitted carbon somewhere along the line. This makes it even more important to use offsets, since they’re needed to supplement even the most conscious individual’s actions.

But not all offsets are created equal. They need to be verified from a trusted source, with full transparency as to their methodology and ability to sequester carbon effectively. Terrapass uses only projects affiliated with the Climate Action Reserve (CAR) or Verified Carbon Standard (VCS), both of which assure transparency and quality in the creation, quantification, and verification of offset projects. It is crucial to make sure your offsets are truly negating as much carbon as they claim, otherwise you won’t be carbon negative, or even carbon neutral.

Terrapass offers offset solutions that can help you work toward carbon negativity whether you are a business or an individual, no matter how large your current carbon footprint may be.

FAQ: Carbon Negative

What does it mean to be carbon negative?

It means offsetting more carbon than you emit, through capture, sequestration, or avoidance, going one step further than carbon neutral, which only requires offsetting an equal amount.

What’s the difference between carbon negative and carbon neutral?

Carbon neutral means your net emissions equal zero (what you emit is fully offset). Carbon negative means you’ve offset more than you emit, resulting in a net-negative footprint.

What’s the difference between carbon negative and net-zero?

Net-zero specifically requires reducing your own emissions as much as possible before offsetting the remainder, rather than relying primarily on offsets. It’s possible to be both net-zero and carbon negative at the same time.

Is it actually possible for a company to become carbon negative?

Yes, in principle, but it requires a coordinated combination of source emissions reductions, cutting indirect (Scope 3) emissions, and purchasing a significant surplus of verified, high-quality offsets. Even well-resourced companies with public pledges have found it harder than expected as demand for energy-intensive technology grows.

Why do carbon offsets matter for reaching carbon negativity?

Since it’s virtually impossible to have zero underlying carbon footprint, verified offsets are the mechanism that lets an individual or company go past neutral into negative territory. Offset quality and third-party verification are essential to whether the claim holds up.

Brought to you by terrapass.com